| Colonial Shooting Academy |
Friday, March 16, 2012
Virginia Congressional Primaries Set for June 12th
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Another Sign We Are Winning
McDonnell’s decision to sign the bill came as no surprise — before the legislation process began, he said that he was against gun rationing. He also explained that more extensive background checks and new laws pertaining to handgun purchases would help maintain public safety.Note that the author used the term "gun rationing" to describe the purpose of the almost twenty year-old law. Yes, the subject of the story is that the families of victims of the Virginia Tech shooting lost in their attempt to have the bill vetoed, but the fact that a term usually used by pro-rights forces found its way into the story is another sign that we are changing the terms of the debate too.
Women Overwhelmingly Represented on NRA All-American Rifle Teams
Monday, March 12, 2012
Does This Mean That Photo ID Requirements to Buy Firearms Will Also Be Tossed by Justice Dept.?
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Anti-gun Group Joins Chorus of Those Applauding Death of Castle Legislation
Virginians for Responsible Gun Laws sent this email today applauding yesterday's effective defeat of the last remaining Castle Doctrine bills. Refering to the bills as "shoot first" legislation, the group called the bills dangerous and unnecessary.
Ironically, the group used language similar to language used by a gun rights group in opposing the bills, explaining that Virginia law on the issue of self defense has been carefully crafted by the courts. A Virginia gun rights group was actively opposing the Castle bills during the General Assembly.
But Andrew Goddard, president of the gun ban group and father of a survivor of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting, went further saying if the bills had passed they would have caused an increase in unnecessary death and violence.
VSSA and the NRA supported the legislation and worked with patrons to address concerns raised by some that the bills would override protections already in common law.
In the end, the legislature, mired in a fight over the budget, decided they could not spend additional time addressing those concerns after taking steps to change the section of the code the bills addressed from the criminal to the civil code, and in the case of HB48, including specific language clarifying the bill:
"...shall not be construed to limit, withdraw, or overturn any defense or immunity already existing in statutory or common law prior to the effective date of this law."
VSSA will continue to work with our friends in the legislature to insure maximum protections for Virginians that are forced to use a firearm in self defense.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Castle Doctrine Bills Effectively Dead for 2012
The Senate, upon consideration of any bill or resolution on the Calendar, may recommit, in accordance with these Rules, the bill or resolution to the Committee reporting the same, and direct the Committee to continue the bill or resolution until the following odd-numbered year regular session, and hold such hearings or render such further consideration of the bill or resolution as the committee may deem proper.In short, HB 48 is on life support. Any action that may be taken will be completed in the fall when committees determine what they will do with legislation carried over from the previous session. Historically, carried over bills do not have a great history of advancing.
SB 4, which emerged from House Courts of Justice on Friday in a form similar to HB 48, was on final reading today and was rereferred back to Courts of Justice, effectively defeating the bill for the year as all committee action had to be completed by March 5th.
Both HB 48 and SB 4 fell victim to several things, not least of which was an active campaign by some claiming that the bills would harm the status quo related to self defense (Virginia is what is commonly referred to as a "stand your ground" state). Both bills however only addressed Virginia's Civil Code, and HB 48 included a provision that stated:
This section shall not be construed to limit, withdraw, or overturn any defense or immunity already existing in statutory or common law prior to the effective date of this law.While Virginia common law is good when it comes to self defense, it has always been VSSA's position that we should not wait until some enterprising lawyer decides to sue on behalf of a criminal or his/her family, an individual who defended themselves from an attack. Just because such a case has not occurred to date does not mean one will never occur. VSSA will continue to work with legislators to pass a Castle Doctrine law that both preserves the protections already in law and provides additional protection for an individual who may be forced to use lethal force to defend themselves and their family.
Coalition to Stop Gun Violence Picks Up Senator Janet Howell's Discredited Claim
You may recall that VSSA posted here about a similar claim made by State Senator Janet Howell (D-Fairfax) a couple of weeks ago. The Richmond Times Dispatch's PolitiFact checker found Senator Howell's claim to be only half true.
The fact is there are more restrictions on purchasing a firearm than there are on voting, and last time I checked, you have to present a Photo ID to purchase a firearm.
Join Email List